11 덧글

1. 
   stereograph · 2018-06-27 07:53

   maybe you choose the wrong iso on the cam? much lower then 200. gets to much light.

2. 
   kwstlv · 2018-06-27 08:45

   Haha! Had lot of those with that very same film. I'd be interested in finding the reason too. Looks very nice tho' :)

3. 
   kwstlv · 2018-06-27 08:45

   Haha! Had lot of those with that very same film. I'd be interested in finding the reason too. Looks very nice tho' :)

4. 
   charliedontsurf · 2018-06-27 10:31

   I don't think that's a fail ! That's a unique look you have there !

5. 
   beblo · 2018-07-22 05:11

   It could be the work/result of the film processing machine? Or, the different chemicals in each emulsion layer of the film, were affected by the environment, even before the film was processed?

6. 
   richardhall · 2018-07-22 06:11

   @beblo Could be. Maybe I'll never know.

7. 
   beblo · 2018-07-22 06:57

   @richardhall,
   here is 1 example where the film processing machine malfunctioned while my film is/was inside:
   www.lomography.co.kr/homes/beblo/photos/22795696?order=tren…

8. 
   richardhall · 2018-07-22 07:24

   @beblo That's interesting - and a lovely picture!

9. 
   beblo · 2018-07-22 07:57

   That negative film scan was the result caused by the intermittent malfunctioning NORITSU film processing machine. I give credit to the machine. .*@:-)

10. 
    richardhall · 2018-07-22 12:39

    @beblo You should take the credit. It was your sound judgement to have the film processed at that particular place and time. The decisive moment! ;o)

11. 
    koduckgirl · 2019-04-16 03:53

    Yes sometimes fails are interesting and this look like George Seurat